1000 bucks for Revit as for 3D Studio and Rhino, etc. That would be nice if it didn't cost any money to put it in Revit, but I suppose it will cost the same cca. Maybe VRay was jointly developed for Revit, but it will nevertheless cost money when it is officially released. CineRender in ARCHICAD has just so much more.īesides that there are of course multiple additional Renderers for both applications (which all cost additional money). Plus, it just doesn't have a lot of things CineRender has. Maybe Autodesk Raytracer can get a decent result in a short time, but there are hardly any customization options in it in terms of rendering effects if you want to go beyond those default settings. I am not exactly sure what you are trying to say.īut if you compare the built-in Renderer in ARCHICAD (CineRender) with the built-in Renderer in Revit (Autodesk Raytracer - they have only one, too), CineRender wins hands down. This product of Chaos Group, isn't it? But it was integrate in Revit jointly. Ps/ don't understand a bit last sentence about Vray. Unfortunately, now they will not support two renderers in AC at the same time, i think. Maybe, look to competitor's trend (Revit), maybe anything else.
Don't know, what must be happen before it change. I hope I haven't put you to sleep with this question and thanks for reading.Yes, I agree that Graphisoft in collaboration with Maxon made the serios rut for a long time. I do find user communities a very useful source of information when learning software packages and so any related links to these is also welcomed in tandem with a recommendation or two.
My photoshop skills aren't too poor and so I suppose what I'm looking for access to is a 3d rendering package that is a) able to take my Archicad model and process it and b) preferably available for free under the terms of a student license. I'm well aware Artlantis isn't the only package and so I'd love to hear some suggestions. I've toyed with Artlantis but from looking at some of the composite images on the presidents medals I can see that one needs to move beyond merely pressing render. I do feel however that I've hit a bit of a wall in terms of generating useful 3d renderings. I started using Archicad 12 on my Macbook Pro at the start of last semester and have progressed to a useful level (still by no means 'competent') whereby I can produce drawings appropriate for the level of a 2nd year student undergraduate. I really don't intend it to be and just wanted some general advice if possible. Apologies in advance if this is construed as a spoon feeding post.
0 kommentar(er)
